<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Beano Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beanoreview.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beanoreview.com</link>
	<description>Britain&#039;s Favourite Comic, Finally Held To Account</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3585 [May 17, 2011] by Kev</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=198#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=198#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Nice review... Two other issues since then.... Perhaps take another look at that mission statement. We care! Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review&#8230; Two other issues since then&#8230;. Perhaps take another look at that mission statement. We care! Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3585 [May 17, 2011] by George Shiers</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=198#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>George Shiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 05:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=198#comment-67</guid>
		<description>When you doing your next review, i&#039;ve already got the next two issues! :/

Yours worringly,

George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you doing your next review, i&#8217;ve already got the next two issues! :/</p>
<p>Yours worringly,</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Beano Review: The Mission Statement by Adrian Mac</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=5#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Mac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=5#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I think the Dandy is currently hilarious. The Beano is pretty good too, but appears to be aimed at a younger audience then the Dandy. I don&#039;t know what the sales figures are these days, but kids have so much else to draw their attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Dandy is currently hilarious. The Beano is pretty good too, but appears to be aimed at a younger audience then the Dandy. I don&#8217;t know what the sales figures are these days, but kids have so much else to draw their attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SPOTLIGHT: Freddie Fear [March 12, 2011] by Old Freddy</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=60#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Freddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 09:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=60#comment-54</guid>
		<description>There is one thing I suppose you could say is &#039;Fearful&#039; about Fredde- when there&#039;s a full moon he turns into a werewolf, but this condition has hardly ever been focused upon and the only example of this that I can think of is his Debut appearence. (Back when Dave Eastbury didn&#039;t use orange gradients like they were going out of fashion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one thing I suppose you could say is &#8216;Fearful&#8217; about Fredde- when there&#8217;s a full moon he turns into a werewolf, but this condition has hardly ever been focused upon and the only example of this that I can think of is his Debut appearence. (Back when Dave Eastbury didn&#8217;t use orange gradients like they were going out of fashion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3584 [May 10, 2011] by George Shiers</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=183#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>George Shiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 09:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=183#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Pirates of the carribeano is an old comic strip, and they are possibly bringing it back because of the new movie.............

..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pirates of the carribeano is an old comic strip, and they are possibly bringing it back because of the new movie&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3583 [May 3, 2011] by Michael</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Zing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3583 [May 3, 2011] by George Shiers</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>George Shiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 21:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like freds foul facts or rodgers dodge diary, its just a boring version of rodgers dodge clinic. the rodger the dodger story is also a re-print :/ - the beano is turning into a magazine, it should learn from the dandy mistakes................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like freds foul facts or rodgers dodge diary, its just a boring version of rodgers dodge clinic. the rodger the dodger story is also a re-print :/ &#8211; the beano is turning into a magazine, it should learn from the dandy mistakes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3583 [May 3, 2011] by Lew Stringer</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew Stringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 12:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Keep exercising that satire and maybe you&#039;ll get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep exercising that satire and maybe you&#8217;ll get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3583 [May 3, 2011] by Michael</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 09:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Harry! We&#039;re quite comfortable with the tone and style in which we write -- The Review is primarily an exercise in satire and editorial voice, after all. But thanks for taking an interest,

Yours, respondingly,

The Beano Review</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Harry! We&#8217;re quite comfortable with the tone and style in which we write &#8212; The Review is primarily an exercise in satire and editorial voice, after all. But thanks for taking an interest,</p>
<p>Yours, respondingly,</p>
<p>The Beano Review</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REVIEW: The Beano 3583 [May 3, 2011] by Harry Rickard</title>
		<link>http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Rickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 06:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beanoreview.com/?p=164#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I find it unfair how you review certain comic strips like Minnie the Minx. You base it on whether or not the Teacher appears or not, you don&#039;t base it around the storyline or the artwork. It&#039;s unfair, the story was brilliant yet because the Teacher did not appear it&#039;s awful. How&#039;s that fair?!

Also you&#039;re taking the mick out of Davey Law&#039;s Dennis the Menace. Not a wise move. I don&#039;t mind his artwork but still, you&#039;re harsh about it and all you do is make comments about his &#039;detached retinas&#039;, and you think that&#039;s funny? Well, I can tell because of that you&#039;ve lost several fans because of your silly insults towards Davey Law.

Also Billy Whizz was explained very clearly, you were probably just too busy mocking the strip to realise. Billy Whizz is saying that there is a zombie film in town, he goes to watch it being filmed but discovers that they&#039;re taking hours to do each person&#039;s zombie make-up, then Billy makes them all zombies really quickly thanks to his speed. Simple.

And who asks a stupid question like that about the Numskulls, so now you base The Numskulls on whether or not Blinky and his glasses are in it? How the hell is that fair? It&#039;s a kids comic for crying out loud, who cares?!

One final thing, I believe you should base the comic strips on the storyline as well as the artwork. Also ignore the perspective nonsense and whatever else, I doubt you could do any better.

I find your reviewing both poor and a bit pathetic really. That&#039;s all from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it unfair how you review certain comic strips like Minnie the Minx. You base it on whether or not the Teacher appears or not, you don&#8217;t base it around the storyline or the artwork. It&#8217;s unfair, the story was brilliant yet because the Teacher did not appear it&#8217;s awful. How&#8217;s that fair?!</p>
<p>Also you&#8217;re taking the mick out of Davey Law&#8217;s Dennis the Menace. Not a wise move. I don&#8217;t mind his artwork but still, you&#8217;re harsh about it and all you do is make comments about his &#8216;detached retinas&#8217;, and you think that&#8217;s funny? Well, I can tell because of that you&#8217;ve lost several fans because of your silly insults towards Davey Law.</p>
<p>Also Billy Whizz was explained very clearly, you were probably just too busy mocking the strip to realise. Billy Whizz is saying that there is a zombie film in town, he goes to watch it being filmed but discovers that they&#8217;re taking hours to do each person&#8217;s zombie make-up, then Billy makes them all zombies really quickly thanks to his speed. Simple.</p>
<p>And who asks a stupid question like that about the Numskulls, so now you base The Numskulls on whether or not Blinky and his glasses are in it? How the hell is that fair? It&#8217;s a kids comic for crying out loud, who cares?!</p>
<p>One final thing, I believe you should base the comic strips on the storyline as well as the artwork. Also ignore the perspective nonsense and whatever else, I doubt you could do any better.</p>
<p>I find your reviewing both poor and a bit pathetic really. That&#8217;s all from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

